Research specialist

Investigate deeply. Keep the evidence inspectable.

Frame a question, gather source-backed evidence, separate findings from inference, and save cited briefs, comparisons, timelines, and unresolved gaps.

Research specialist · Supply chain resilienceEvidence review

8

questions

31

sources

12

findings

3

contradictions

Evidence to review
Primary capacity dataCITED
Supplier concentrationCITED
Lead-time estimateCHECK
Outputs
Research briefREADY
Vendor comparisonDRAFT
Evidence timelineDRAFT

An illustrative research Library with cited findings and review state.

What you can do

From open question to durable, cited output.

Research briefs

Define the question, scope, key subquestions, and evidence standard before synthesis.

Evidence review

Use saved sources and provenance to distinguish supported findings from inference.

Contradictions and gaps

Keep conflicting evidence and unresolved questions visible instead of smoothing them away.

Comparisons and timelines

Save cited tables, visual artifacts, relationships, and Canvas maps beside the source trail.

Durable outputs

Research remains in notes, tags, artifacts, graph relationships, and Canvas—not a disposable chat log.

Connected AI, bounded access

Your chosen AI reasons through MCP while Prism owns authorization, sources, and reviewable outputs.

Prism does not introduce a generic autonomous research agent; the connected AI remains the orchestrator.

Your knowledge should outlast the tool.

Start free. Build one durable Library, authorize one AI connection, and make the context you own useful everywhere.